The Valentine caper, what became the purloined poplar heart petitions, had, in just a few hours, garnered numerous names and comments, to retain the architectural and historic 150-plus poplars along …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you had an active account on our previous website, then you have an account here. Simply reset your password to regain access to your account.
If you did not have an account on our previous website, but are a current print subscriber, click here to set up your website account.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
* Having trouble? Call our circulation department at 360-385-2900, or email our support.
Please log in to continue |
|
The Valentine caper, what became the purloined poplar heart petitions, had, in just a few hours, garnered numerous names and comments, to retain the architectural and historic 150-plus poplars along Sims Way.
But it turns out no amount of public comment to any electeds can bring a change to this ill-conceived project unless it is abandoned and resubmitted. And here is why. This plan was conceived in August 2021 by the city, the port and PUD staff. In September 2021 the city staff presented a $100,000 Public Infrastructure Development (PID) grant proposal to the city council, which approved it.
The three agencies then went to the county in October 2021 combining their PID grant requests totaling $2 million in “free” county infrastructure tax money; the county committee granted them $1 million. But that money was based on and limited by conditions outlined in the scope the staff had written - the removal of all the poplars.
This week PUD manager Streett indicated the utility lines could be undergrounded without removing the poplars, but the PUD would lose its share of the PID grant if it did not follow the original grant conditions, removing the poplars; same for the city. The port would retain its share for the expansion - no trees involved.
What we just learned is that part of the rationale for the original $1 million grant was to promote tourism. Really.
Removing the poplars and putting in a sidewalk was, said County Administrator McCauly, considered an economic benefit by the granting authority - a way to promote tourism.
We’re not making this up.
What we know as the historic seaport with its iconic poplar-lined entrance of the last 100 years has been determined not to be tourist-friendly.
To access the PID funds and retain the poplars, the agencies must submit a new proposal to the county demonstrating support for jobs and the economy, leaving the poplars in place - a truly beautiful gateway for the future.
Julie Jaman
Poplar Alliance
Olympic Environmental Council
Friends of Kah Tai
PORT TOWNSEND