Don’t allow war games on our state parkland | Letter to the editor

Posted 1/7/21

Almost exactly five years ago, I wrote a letter to the Navy and to this paper decrying the Navy’s proposal to use our area parks for military maneuvers.  

Now I learn that the …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

E-mail
Password
Log in

Don’t allow war games on our state parkland | Letter to the editor

Posted

Almost exactly five years ago, I wrote a letter to the Navy and to this paper decrying the Navy’s proposal to use our area parks for military maneuvers.  

Now I learn that the Washington State Parks Department granted permission for such activity and is now on the verge of renewing that permission.

It seems to me totally insane to allow our beautiful public parks to be militarized! 

Living in Port Townsend, I am aware of the heavy daily use of Fort Worden. During this time of pandemic, it is an especially welcome place for walking. During more normal times, it is a hive of activity in all seasons, at all times. How bizarre to think that military personnel may be hiding in the bushes or preparing to arrive stealthily on the beach by the Marine Science Center or lighthouse.

How can the Navy be allowed to do this? Why are their own substantial reserves not sufficient for these exercises? Why bring war training into populated areas? And why is it assumed that we the people must quietly acquiesce to the militarization of our neighborhoods? 

Furthermore, the Navy cannot be trusted to follow any limits put on their activities in the parks. Earlier, they agreed to notify local law enforcement of any war games trainings in state parks. They apparently have not. In addition, the Navy has refused to indemnify Washington State Parks or local jurisdictions from possible damages or injuries caused by their activities.

I have written to the Washington State Parks Commission about this and to Congressman Derek Kilmer. I urge others to do the same.

Helen Lauritzen
PORT TOWNSEND

Comments

1 comment on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here

  • forsho

    Thank you, Helen. There is no possible way to paint this as being of benefit to the State Parks (29 of them are proposed for use). This is, plain and simple, a "taking" attempt by the Navy. Their sole explanation for wanting to use the Parks, is that there are "unique" characteristics which are not found on the Navy's 50 or so miles of coastal shorelines from which the public is permanently excluded.

    Prove it.

    Thursday, January 7, 2021 Report this