We need Supreme Court reform. We can start with expanding the court to 13 justices that reflect our country.
The current Supreme Court is no longer a viable part of checks and balances. Because …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you had an active account on our previous website, then you have an account here. Simply reset your password to regain access to your account.
If you did not have an account on our previous website, but are a current print subscriber, click here to set up your website account.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
* Having trouble? Call our circulation department at 360-385-2900, or email our support.
Please log in to continue |
|
We need Supreme Court reform. We can start with expanding the court to 13 justices that reflect our country.
The current Supreme Court is no longer a viable part of checks and balances. Because it now reflects billionaires who prefer to buy a SCOTUS justice instead of building rockets into space or touring the Titanic, it’s no longer trustworthy. Because of the level of corruption from Chief Justice Roberts to justices seated during Trump’s presidency, the few ethical justices are tarred with the same proverbial brush.
We must have legislation that checks the SCOTUS and returns the “balance” to “checks and balances.”
Linda van der Wal
PORT TOWNSEND
