The real scandal/story is in the failure of those in charge of managing the water supply to have a monitoring system in place (aka flow meter) at the source rather than point of use.
There is …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you had an active account on our previous website, then you have an account here. Simply reset your password to regain access to your account.
If you did not have an account on our previous website, but are a current print subscriber, click here to set up your website account.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
* Having trouble? Call our circulation department at 360-385-2900, or email our support.
Please log in to continue |
|
The real scandal/story is in the failure of those in charge of managing the water supply to have a monitoring system in place (aka flow meter) at the source rather than point of use.
There is most certainly/hopefully a chief engineer or supervisor, someone with an engineering degree (P.E.), who is responsible for managing the Port Townsend water system. For the public good your reporting should be naming names ... of those in charge.
That person’s credentials / certifications / capabilities should be investigated /verified.
If the only change realized from this incident is repairing the break and not improving the way flows are monitored/recorded? P.T. is in trouble.
Tom Gault
Chimacum
