Two cartoons, if I'm allowed by the "Leader" software to put two drawings on one entry. Yes, they're also cartoons previously declined, passed-over-and/or-passed-on by "The New Yorker," but, since I, …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you had an active account on our previous website, then you have an account here. Simply reset your password to regain access to your account.
If you did not have an account on our previous website, but are a current print subscriber, click here to set up your website account.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
* Having trouble? Call our circulation department at 360-385-2900, or email our support.
Please log in to continue |
|
Two cartoons, if I'm allowed by the "Leader" software to put two drawings on one entry. Yes, they're also cartoons previously declined, passed-over-and/or-passed-on by "The New Yorker," but, since I, obviously, thought they were good enough for that publication, I.. I'm just trying to get a distance from any notion that, "Okay, good enough for us here in the ruburbs."
No, not that at all. And, just for some background, there is no latent, hidden, or subliminal referencing here; unless, maybe, you think there is. Feel free.
Meanwhile, if you get a chance, check out realsurfers.net for surf-centric drawings. WAIT! Maybe I can only put one image on this post. Now you'll have to check realsurfers.net to see the other one. I'm afraid to hit the "Browse" button again, having already hit it twice. Either there'll be two drawings, or it'll be the second one. I'll put both, plus a third money-related drawing on realsurfers.net
