The advertising in last week’s paper made it easy to cast my vote for sheriff in the upcoming election.
The combination of a full-page ad suggesting that Joe Nole is a liar who has no …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you had an active account on our previous website, then you have an account here. Simply reset your password to regain access to your account.
If you did not have an account on our previous website, but are a current print subscriber, click here to set up your website account.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
* Having trouble? Call our circulation department at 360-385-2900, or email our support.
Please log in to continue |
|
The advertising in last week’s paper made it easy to cast my vote for sheriff in the upcoming election.
The combination of a full-page ad suggesting that Joe Nole is a liar who has no concern for the well-being of our school kids, plus the half-page “check list” which is equally negative, plus the numerous line ads in the classifieds was a sufficient turnoff to sway me toward Joe Nole.
Running a hugely negative campaign is not the way to gain votes in my opinion. The ads are condescending, heavy-handed, and of questionable accuracy.
Mr. Frank may or may not be the better candidate, but based on the tone of his campaign, the decision to vote for Mr. Nole was straightforward.
David Conklin
PORT TOWNSEND
