Many people may be unaware that our service members - our sons, daughters, friends and neighbors - are training in the skies above the Olympic Mountains to take the fight to the enemy on our behalf.

The Navy recently proposed a plan to provide more realistic training at substantial savings to taxpayers, but certain groups and individuals have chosen to spread misconceptions about the proposed training.

The training is about detecting, sorting and identifying certain electronic signals amongst the deluge of existing signal clutter and determining appropriate actions against signals of interest. Our aircraft provide electronic support to soldiers and marines on the ground and our fellow airmen in the sky. This proposed change to existing training will enhance the Navy's ability to provide that support.

The Navy flies over the coastal waters of the Pacific Ocean, Olympic Peninsula, the Cascade Mountain Range and eastern Washington as we have for the past 40 years. The proposed plan does not introduce new flight areas; it proposes using mobile training emitters on existing logging roads on national forestland to improve the training our air crews receive today. The specific training these emitters provide enable air crew to safely and successfully counter enemy defenses when they fly into harm's way. The armed services have decades of experience successfully operating similar fixed and mobile emitters at a variety of locations across the nation. It is extremely unlikely that the training conducted in the Pacific Northwest will adversely affect people, animals or the environment.

There have been misrepresentations of the facts, and I would like to address some of what we have been hearing.

Myth: These emitters are dangerous.

Fact: The Navy uses the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) "Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz" to make its determinations. The IEEE standard serves as a consensus standard developed by representatives of industry, government agencies, the scientific community and the public. In addition, there is a long history of these systems being safely employed to provide our aviators with the training they need without incident or adverse effects.

Myth: The Navy is planning to bring many more planes to the Olympic National Forest.

Fact: Electronic warfare training is already being conducted in the Northwest. The number, duration and frequency of aircraft flights in the operating area are only projected to increase by 10 percent, which equates to an average increase of one flight per day. These are not low-altitude flights, and most go unnoticed as our crews train in these areas today. As the number and duration of flights are not expected to increase significantly, and the typical flight profile is not planned to change, there is no expected change in aircraft noise.

Myth: The Navy is planning to conduct war games.

Fact: There are no war games planned. The only change is the addition of a mobile transmitter to improve the training we currently simulate. During these training missions, which already occur in these areas, the planes only receive signals; they are not broadcasting and will not be "jamming." The frequencies used by the mobile transmitters will be deconflicted by the Federal Communications Commission and will not impact other broadcast signals, so vital services will not be interrupted.

Myth: The Navy will be flying at low altitudes and at supersonic speeds.

Fact: The Navy has no intention of flying at low altitudes or at speeds above the sound barrier. The mission requires the aircraft to be able to directly observe the emitters, typically flying at altitudes of 10,000 feet or greater. Low-altitude flight does not support the training. Supersonic flight above the United States is tightly controlled by the FAA; plus, when our planes conduct this training, they do not fly supersonic.

I hope this information is helpful. You can find additional information at

We strive to keep the public informed of our activities. The ability to send a signal toward an aircraft and have the crew train to detect and identify the signal allows for more finely tuned skills to be used when lives are at risk. This training is designed to protect and save American lives.

The young men and women who volunteer to protect our great nation and, by extension, every one of us, deserve the very best equipment and training opportunities this country can provide. We owe it to them.

(Capt. Michael Nortier is the commanding officer at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island.)

(2) comments

Linda Sutton

Also please note that this was a press release sent by the Navy's press officer, Mike Welding, and published in multiple newspapers regionally with extensive comments under each. See PDN's link with counterpoint responses to Nortier's "myths" by Karen Sullivan:

Linda Sutton

For those who want a more in depth backgrounder on this issue, go to the Facebook page Protect Olympic Peninsula. (you don't have to be ON Facebook to access this page). It began following the first meeting in Forks after the Forks Forum - Forks Washington's hometown newspaper published the first article about the Navy wanting to use the Olympic National Forest roads immediately adjacent to the Olympic National Park for their electromagnetic warfare range training of new Growler jet pilots flying out of Whidbey Island NAS. There are archived videos of all the Navy/Forest Service meetings (scroll down page to find). Also see this video of the dangers of cell phones--something the Navy has constantly used as their comparison:

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.