On the day before the mid-term election, a big brown smoke-cloud was visible somewhere south of Port Hadlock — a “slash-fire” from one of the many land-clearing projects on this peninsula. …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you had an active account on our previous website, then you have an account here. Simply reset your password to regain access to your account.
If you did not have an account on our previous website, but are a current print subscriber, click here to set up your website account.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
* Having trouble? Call our circulation department at 360-385-2900, or email our support.
Please log in to continue |
|
On the day before the mid-term election, a big brown smoke-cloud was visible somewhere south of Port Hadlock — a “slash-fire” from one of the many land-clearing projects on this peninsula. While the blustery weather was clearly blowing it to the east, don't we account for the pollution?
The Olympic Region Clean Air Agency explained that, other than restrictions related to "urban growth boundaries and dry-season burn-bans, the fire marshal will issue a permit for fires large and small." In other words, our fire-smoke guidelines are mostly about proximity.
In the modern context of climate change, which doesn't recognize the difference between King County and Beijing, air quality/pollution laws should reflect the big picture. And the burden of behavioral adjustment should be shared accordingly.
The list of cultural modifications we've made as individual consumers seems like a much longer one than that of industry. Burning “slash” to clear land for development seems like one of those examples.
Get with the program.
Art James
Port Ludlow